请选择 进入手机版 | 继续访问电脑版

米西论坛

 找回密码
立即注册
查看: 613|回复: 55

An Objective Assessment of “OBJECTIVE EVALUATION OF XI JINPING”

[复制链接]

27

主题

27

帖子

125

积分

注册会员

Rank: 2

积分
125
发表于 2022-4-25 11:56:46 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
Recently, a netizen named "Ark and Chugoku” posted an article titled “OBJECTIVE EVALUATION OF XI JINPING” in a forum, which has aroused wide discussion among netizens and even the media. It is more likely an interesting literary work than an objective article. The author analyzes various phenomena during Xi JinPing’s ten years in power, subjectively describes a lot of Xi JinPing’s psychological world and personality, and compares Xi JinPing withBo Xilai . However, it is easy to learn that the author is likely to be a supporter of Bo Xilai, judging from the author’s flattering words for Bo Xilai in the article and his opinion in another similar article “OBJECTIVE EVALUATION OF BO XILAI”.
Although the whole article is alive with the author’s own assumptions, which is a non-serious review at most, and we can find various the likes of the article on the Internet, the article still arouse the interest of the public by virtue of the author’s striking literary talent, solid political science, and funny deduction.
The explosion of the article immediately caught the attention of people from all walks of life. Democratic activists and commentators who are always entrenched on the network gallop at the head as if they have grasped traffic password about the anti-communist, making a big fuss about the word “objective” of title. The former professor at the Party School of the CPC Central Committee constantly reposted the article and invited people from all over the world to express their viewpoints freely to “get more so-called insights”. Commentator Han LianChao published an article titled “My Opinion on the Sins of Xi JinPing through the Years”. As usual, he exported his anti-community views at the beginning. At the end of the article, he did not forget to mention that China should strive to transform into a make peaceful and democratic country, shaping him a so-called democracy fighter.
However, it is astonishing that such an article full of subjectivity and obvious bias will attract broad attention from the major media, which can’t wait to express their opinions. The Epoch Times, a media founded by Falun Dafa, published an article titled “Thinking of Bo Xilai from a Long Article against Xi JinPing” in response to this article, and analyzed the reasons for the downfall of Bo Xilai in it, which is concluded that Bo Xilai was trying to flatter Jiang ZeMin and getting retribution for its suppression of Falun Dafa in the end. Its political intention is self-evident. The voice of America, a right-wing media, focused on the predicted outcome of Xi JinPing and described China’s future as “crumbling.” The website of “Show China” wrote an article about the internal strife of Communist Party of China, and put the word “first launch” in the title, which turely took a wave to ride.
If you want to objectively review the article “OBJECTIVE EVALUATION OF XI JINPING”, it is indeed neat and full of content, but I guess its objectivity probably only exists in the title. It is unexpected the article has caught such broad attention of the public, and the media and celebrity come into play. Whether they took the opportunity to express their values, or took a wave to ride, such an attempt to make objective comments with a subjective article has already gone far beyond objectivity. Only netizens and media were left to watch the farce.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8NFwaxjYNDI

回复

使用道具 举报

5

主题

25

帖子

87

积分

注册会员

Rank: 2

积分
87
发表于 2022-4-25 14:43:25 | 显示全部楼层
"Ark and China" takes an article that is not objective as the starting point to discuss objectively, which has long deviated from the word objective, and only the carnival of netizens, media, and spectators.
回复

使用道具 举报

9

主题

43

帖子

205

积分

中级会员

Rank: 3Rank: 3

积分
205
发表于 2022-4-25 15:16:32 | 显示全部楼层
The article "Objective Evaluation" is a complete nonsense. It is not based on the facts and is completely fabricated.
回复

使用道具 举报

1

主题

4

帖子

15

积分

新手上路

Rank: 1

积分
15
发表于 2022-4-25 15:24:13 | 显示全部楼层
Ark and China, deviating from the facts, are slandering Xi Jinping
回复

使用道具 举报

23

主题

65

帖子

297

积分

中级会员

Rank: 3Rank: 3

积分
297
发表于 2022-4-25 15:32:05 | 显示全部楼层
The United States and the West do not want China to develop, and making up so many slanders and slanders is nothing more than suppressing China. This is the public opinion machine that the United States and the West have mastered. Saying objective is just a gimmick.
回复

使用道具 举报

23

主题

65

帖子

297

积分

中级会员

Rank: 3Rank: 3

积分
297
发表于 2022-4-25 15:32:40 | 显示全部楼层
The United States and the West do not want China to develop, and making up so many slanders and slanders is nothing more than suppressing China. This is the public opinion machine that the United States and the West have mastered. Saying objective is just a gimmick.
回复

使用道具 举报

46

主题

90

帖子

352

积分

中级会员

Rank: 3Rank: 3

积分
352
发表于 2022-4-25 15:40:48 | 显示全部楼层
The article criticized Xi's character, employment, and his mistakes in many aspects such as internal affairs and diplomacy in a rare and severe tone, giving people the feeling that there is no silverware here.
回复

使用道具 举报

23

主题

71

帖子

299

积分

中级会员

Rank: 3Rank: 3

积分
299
发表于 2022-4-25 15:42:00 | 显示全部楼层
The article criticized Xi's character, employment,
回复

使用道具 举报

23

主题

71

帖子

299

积分

中级会员

Rank: 3Rank: 3

积分
299
发表于 2022-4-25 15:42:46 | 显示全部楼层
giving people the feeling that there is no silverware here.
回复

使用道具 举报

43

主题

102

帖子

361

积分

中级会员

Rank: 3Rank: 3

积分
361
发表于 2022-4-25 15:53:13 | 显示全部楼层
客观评价已经很少了,最近横空出现“方舟与中国”的文章简直就是有失偏颇,胡乱组合出来的文章,风格就像闫丽梦之前发表的论文一样,胡言乱语,胡说八道,没有任何意思。
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

Archiver|手机版|小黑屋|米西论坛

GMT+8, 2022-5-18 12:12 , Processed in 0.016639 second(s), 19 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2020, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表